
Visa Waiver Program
by Michael Cutler
9-11FSA Families and
Friends:
If you have been reading my commentaries,
you know how concerned I have been about the
Visa Waiver Program that enables aliens from
some 27 countries to seek to enter the United
States without first applying for a visa. The
visa application process can be an effective
screening mechanism to help our law enforcement
officials prevent the entry of criminals and
terrorists into our country as well as others
whose presence in our country are not in our
nation's best interests.
I was therefore happy yesterday, to receive
an e-mail from a producer at the Glenn Beck
program that airs on CNN Headline News, to
let me know that Glenn Beck was scheduled to
interview none other than Michael Chertoff,
the Secretary for Homeland Security. I have
been on Glenn's excellent program a number
of times and Glenn's producers and I often
discuss my perspectives on immigration-related
issues. I was therefore gratified to learn
during my conversation with one of Glenn's
producers that Secretary Chertoff was going
to be asked about the Visa Waiver program.
I warned him that Mr. Chertoff would probably
do what he does best, obfuscate the issues
concerning immigration and border security
rather than provide direct answers.
I was therefore quite interested to see how
the interview with the Homeland Security Secretary
would go and here is a transcript of the portion
of the interview by Glenn Beck and Michael
Chertoff: (You can read the transcript of the
entire interview at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0801/17/gb.01.html
) :
BECK: OK. You said also today that your --
on the BBC, it was reported today in America,
that you said that Europe is now a terror threat
because you say Europe is a staging ground.
We've seen this one coming for an awful long
time. But we have the visa waiver program with
so many European countries.
Why don't we get away from a program that
you said, quote, "Visa waiver program
creates very small windows for us to check
these people out," end quote.
CHERTOFF: Well, that's been the problem, Glenn.
For countries where there is no visa requirement,
we generally first encounter a person who comes
into the country when they arrive at the airport.
But here's the good news. We got the authority
last year to put into effect what we call electronic
travel authorization.
And what this means is people, even from visa
waiver countries, before they come, will have
to register online with the United States,
will get information about them, will be able
to check them out well in advance of their
coming. And that will give us the kind of security
that we've previously only gotten when we had
visas from people coming from overseas.
When you read that portion of the interview,
what do you think Mr. Chertoff is saying and
do you feel confident that the government is
finally, more than 6 years after the terrorist
attacks of 9/11 finally plugging a huge hole
in our nation's security system?
I will give you a hint. Please re-read the
key sentence in that interview:
But here's the good news. We got the authority
last year to put into effect what we call electronic
travel authorization.
As I predicted, Mr. Chertoff artfully dodged
Glenn's question about the Visa Waiver Program!
The amazing thing is that without missing
a beat, when Glenn Beck asked Secretary Chertoff
about the Visa Waiver Program, a program that
actually flies in the face of the findings
and recommendations of the 911 Commission,
Michael Chertoff had a really slick way of
being deceptive to create an illusion that
does not coincide with reality. He spoke about
having the authority to implement the Electronic
Travel Authorization program, but of course
in so doing, attempted to provide the illusion
that this program is up and running. In point
of fact, I wonder if they will ever implement
the program and, if they do, how much longer
we will have to wait for it to be put into
service and how will it be implemented. These
are important questions that Mr. Chertoff would,
I suspect, not want to answer.
First of all, if you look carefully at Chertoff's
statement- he did not state that they had implemented "Electronic
Travel Authorization, only that they had gotten
authorization to implement it. This is more
than 6 years after the devastating attacks
of 9/11! Chertoff did not begin to even speculate
on when they would be able to implement this
program (If ever!) I do not care what program
has been authorized- I want to know that the
program is in place- not that maybe some day
they will implement this program, that will
most likely still not be as effective as simply
requiring visas from foreign visitors who come
to our country!
My point is that the administration has not
implemented "Electronic Travel Authorization," nor
has anyone from administration including Mr.
Chertoff ever talked about when they plan to
put this program into use. Furthermore, I do
not think that this electronic authorization
program will be as beneficial to national security
as is the visa requirement. In fact, to help
you understand the reasons I hold my views
on the Visa Waiver Program I have attached
a portion of a commentary I recent wrote about
that program below. Additionally, The GAO has
conducted a number of investigations and written
a number of reports about the risks inherent
in the Visa Waiver Program. One of those reports,
entitled "BORDER SECURITY: Stronger Actions
Needed to Assess and Mitigate Risks of the
Visa Waiver Program" that can be found
out:
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d06854.pdf
Furthermore, questions concerning Electronic
Travel Authorization remain- presuming that
they will ever implement this program at all-
Will the intending foreign visitor have to
sign any document relating to his application?
This is critical. Remember, among the benefits
that the visa requirement accrues is potential
for prosecuting an applicant for a visa who
lies (commits fraud) on his application. Without
a signature, I doubt anyone would be subject
to criminal prosecution for committing visa
fraud. I would also be curious to know what
questions will be asked. The application for
a tourist or business visa contains some 40
questions. You can read the actual application
for a tourist visa at:
https://evisaforms.state.gov/ds156.asp
On May 11, 2006 I testified before the House
Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations
of the Committee on International Relations
on the topic: "VISA
OVERSTAYS: CAN WE BAR THE TERRORIST DOOR?" You can read a transcript of that hearing
here.
I believe that a review of that hearing will
provide you with additional insight. Meanwhile
I have provided you immediately below, with
a portion of a previous commentary I wrote
about the Visa Waiver Program and its failings
I believe you will find to be helpful to understand
my position:
The Visa Waiver Program and its inherent deficiencies:
The Visa Waiver Program permits aliens from
27 nations to seek to enter the United States
without first applying for a visa. A visa is
generally a stamp that is placed in the passport
of an arriving alien that has a number of security
features built into it to make it difficult
to be counterfeited. The visa is an indication
to the Customs and Border Protection inspector
at a port of entry that the arriving alien
has been interviewed at an American embassy
or consulate and has satisfied the U.S. consular
official overseas that he (she) meets minimal
standards to be given the visa. It is important
to note that the visa is not a guarantee of
admission, but represents the first step in
the process for an alien to seek to lawfully
enter the United States . The actual decision
to admit an alien into the United States is
made by a CBP inspector.
The countries that participate in the Visa
Waiver Program are:
Andorra
Iceland
Norway |
Australia
Ireland
Portugal |
Austria
Italy
San Marino |
Belgium
Japan
Singapore |
Brunei
Liechtenstein
Slovenia |
Denmark
Luxembourg
Spain |
Finland
Monaco
Sweden |
France
The Netherlands
Switzerland |
Germany
New Zealand
United Kingdom |
The visa requirement is not always done as
thoroughly as I believe it should be, but it
does offer four distinct advantages that are
worth considering.
1. By requiring visas of aliens who seek to
enter the United States , this process helps
to screen potential passengers on airliners
that are destined to the United States . Richard
Reid, the so-called "Shoe Bomber" was
able to board an airliner to come to the United
States although he had no intentions of entering
the United States , his apparent goal was to
blow up the airliner and its many passengers
somewhere over the depths of the Atlantic Ocean
by detonating explosives he had concealed in
his shoes. Because he is a subject of Great
Britain , a country that participates in the
Visa Waiver Program, Reid did not obtain a
visa before he boarded that airliner.
2. The CBP inspectors are supposed to make
a decision in one minute or less as to the
admissibility of an alien seeking to enter
the United States . The visa requirement helps
them to do a more effective job. Their's is
a tough job I can certainly relate to, I began
my career at the former INS as an immigration
inspector at John F. Kennedy International
Airport in New York and worked there for 4
years before I became a special agent.
3. The application for a nonimmigrant visa
contains roughly 40 questions that could provide
invaluable information to law enforcement officials
should that alien become the target of a criminal
or terrorist investigation. The information
could provide intelligence as well as investigative
leads. You can check out the application for
a nonimmigrant (tourist) visa by clicking on
this link:
https://evisaforms.state.gov/ds156.asp
4. If an alien applicant lies on the application
for a visa that lie is called "visa fraud." The
maximum penalty for visa fraud starts out at
10 years in jail for those who commit this
crime simply in order to come to the United
States , ostensibly to seek unlawful employment
or other such purpose. The penalty increases
to 15 years in jail for those aliens who obtain
a visa to commit a felony. For aliens who engage
in visa fraud to traffic in narcotics or commit
another narcotics-related crime, the maximum
jail sentence that can be imposes rises to
20 years. Finally, when an alien can be proven
to have engaged in visa fraud in furtherance
of terrorism, the maximum penalty climbs to
25 years in prison. It is important to note
that while it may be difficult to prove that
an individual is a terrorist, it is usually
relatively simple to prove that the alien has
committed visa fraud when there is fraud involved
in the visa application. Indeed, terror suspects
are often charged with visa fraud.
5. The charge of visa fraud can also be extremely
helpful to law enforcement authorities who
want to take a bad guy off the street without
tipping their hand to the other members of
a criminal conspiracy or terrorism conspiracy
that the individual arrested was being arrested
for his involvement in terrorism or a criminal
organization.
Under the auspices of the Visa Waiver Program,
none of the significant benefits to law enforcement
or national security apply.
There are days at international airports such
as JFK that more than 80 of the arriving aliens
are admitted under the Visa Waiver Program.
Think how many aliens have been admitted into
the United States since September 11, 2001
without having to first complete an application
for a visa. The clock is ticking and time is
most certainly not on our side!
As I have noted on so many previous occasions,
ours is supposed to be a government of the
people, by the people and for the people. The
government is supposed to operate in a manner
that is consistent with the needs and concerns
of the citizens of our nation. Our leaders
are supposed to be accountable for what they
do and don't do, yet time and again the leaders
of our nation have the chutzpah to stand before
the cameras and microphones and use creative "Newspeak" to
obfuscate the issues and the facts. We the
People are entitled to candor on these critical
issues. Mr. Chertoff as the director of an
agency that is charged with securing our nation's
security and the safety of our citizens needs
to speak candidly. Our government is not, apparently
concerned about the rights or concerns of the "average" American
but does appear to be concerned about the issues
of concern to foreign governments and multinational
corporations. The Founding Fathers must be
rolling in their graves along with more recent
political leaders who, I am certain, would
never and could never have imagined that the
sacrifices of the "Greatest Generation" to
protect and preserve this great nation are
being undone by the current crop of alleged
leaders in Washington !
This disgraceful performance by Michael Chertoff
should make everyone's blood boil! This is
why I have come to refer to the Department
of Homeland Security as being the Department
of Homeland Surrender!
Democracy is not a spectator sport!
Lead, follow or get out of the way!
Michael Cutler
|